This text beforehand appeared in Protection Scoop
The Division of Struggle (DoW) senior Acquisition management (the individuals who resolve what and the way the DoW buys gear and providers) now’s headed by folks from non-public capital (enterprise capital and personal fairness.)
The Division of Struggle is within the midst of once-in-a-lifetime adjustments of the way it acquires weapons, software program and methods. The brand new Warfighting Acquisition System rewards velocity and well timed supply of issues that matter to the Warfighter. However this new system is susceptible to making the incorrect issues go sooner.
Right here’s why and what they need to do.
What Now?
Acquisition within the DoW is being reorganized how a Personal Fairness would reorganize a big firm. They bring about in (or empower) a brand new working workforce, swap executives, change incentives, kill issues not core to their mission, reduce prices, make investments for progress, and restructure to seek out extra financing.
That’s being performed out on the Division of Struggle proper now. The announcement of the consolidation of particular person weapons methods (every of which had their very own silos of Necessities, Check/Analysis, Budgeting, and Acquisition) right into a unified Portfolio Acquisition Government, is a traditional Personal Fairness technique. As an alternative of 100s of packages working with separate budgets, throughout completely different Program Government Places of work, the intent of the Portfolio Acquisition Executives is to consolidate overlapping packages, get rid of the redundant ones, choose winners, kill losers, eliminate processes that kill velocity, and concentrate on fast deployment.
What’s Lacking?
Organizing by Portfolio Acquisition Executives is a good begin, however merely consolidating the components of the protection Acquisition system that had been damaged underneath one umbrella group received’t make it higher. Making dangerous concepts go sooner shouldn’t be the purpose. Nonetheless, we’re susceptible to doing simply that. (Pete Newell at BMNT has been reminding me of this for years.)
For instance, many of those new Portfolio executives are managing their packages by holding month-to-month opinions of proposed investments and present portfolio efficiency (identical to non-public buyers.) Right here they’ll resolve which packages get funded, which get extra funding, and which ought to cease. (Really having a daily course of to kill packages early is sorely wanted.) These are nice concepts. Nonetheless, if the conferences begin by reviewing progress of prototypes to point out that the expertise works or that warfighters need it, and funds progress on these metrics, it misses the adjustments wanted in an efficient acquisition system.
The consequence will likely be constructing a sooner model of a weapons necessities course of that begins with a top-down record of options, or worse, shiny tech merchandise (e.g. “I would like drones.”) This “necessities first” course of is what is going to drive the “dangerous concepts sooner” downside.
A extra productive method – one which delivers really decisive capabilities – could be to construct a distinct course of upfront – a rigorous downside identification and validation part on the front-end of each acquisition program.
This course of would begin with a large funnel of issues, concepts, expertise, every with a 10-line downside abstract that describes the particular problem to handle; why it could’t be solved at present; what it’s going to take to unravel it; and the way an answer will likely be funded and deployed within the area.
The purpose could be to 1) consolidate issues that could be completely different descriptions of the identical core downside, and/or 2) uncover if the issues are a symptom of one thing extra advanced.
Then every downside would undergo an iterative technique of downside and technical discovery. It will assist outline what a minimal deployable product and its minimal constraints (safety, coverage, reliability) needs to be, resembling how lengthy the answer would take to deploy, the supply of funding for scale and who must buy-in.
This train will preserve the main target the place it must be — not on reforming a system however on delivering issues to warfighters with velocity and urgency so we will truly deter or win a struggle.
Need to Hold Up With the Adjustments within the DoW?
Get the free 2026 DoW Listing.
Each a startup “go-to-market” information and the primary ever Listing of the Division of Struggle. It’s a useful desk reference to determine who, what and the place.
Obtain the free DoW Listing right here.
Hold present with updates right here
Order a desk copy right here
Filed underneath: Nationwide Safety |
